The Swedish Moose Uncovered

Zwischen Immer und Nie. Between Always and Never. A concept that stems from the neverending summer in which a moment of time is held in infinity but also nothing. Within ‘Call me by your name’ the notion relates to a relationship that stemmed from emotion expressed through silence and understated behaviour.  The two main characters that the novel is centred around are Elio and Oliver. Elio is the 17-year old, trilingual, musical genius, son of an Italian philosophy professor and Oliver is characterised as the 24-year old, American graduate who is spending the summer in Italy under the supervision of Elio’s father whilst working on his manuscript for his studies.  Andre Aciman captures the essence of summer ‘somewhere in Northern Italy’ in 1983, in which the scenery of Monet’s Berm encapsulates a moment of everything, every emotion, every unsaid thought between the characters of Elio and Oliver, and suspends it in a bubble of happiness, sensuality, and summertime.  How

The Taming of the Shrew: Is it still relevant in Modern Society or are we all just delusional? Controversy sparks legacy. The Taming of the Shrew is controversial within many groups of society. Some feminists use excerpts from the text as evidence of female oppression, domestic abuse, power struggles within Shakespeare's time. From a feminist perspective, the character development of Katherine portrays the conformity needed to survive in the Shakespearean era. Additionally, the play uses satirical elements to transform what could be interpreted as a tragedy into the social commentary as it is typically interpreted. The Taming of the Shrew is still relevant today through the constant reproduction, and in turn interpretation, of the elements, themes and concepts that surround the controversy that is Shakespeare and his work. It is obvious from the first reading of The Taming of the Shrew that the societal norms of the Shakespearean era drastically contrast to modern-day. The

Matt Furie v. Infowars, LLC et al. Australian Copyright Law and the balancing act; Innovation versus Intellectual Property Rights ‘Fair use’ within the Australian Legislation is not reciprocal to the US Legislation. Within the Australian Copyright Act (1968) fair dealings by definition mean “using the material in any of the ways reserved to the copyright owner” (ACC INFORMATION SHEET G079v08 December 2017) and not “the legal doctrine that promotes freedom of expression by permitting the unlicensed use of copyright-protected works in certain circumstances” as expressed in US fair use copyright law (copyright.gov July 2018). There is a substantial difference between the US and Australian legislation and thus affects the outcome of copyright cases like the Matt Furie v. Infowars, LLC et al case. In achieving harmony between the two separate parties the court must facilitate innovation and intellectual property right, although not obstructed by th

The Third-Rail   Australia’s Feud with Energy Policies And how it affects the average household Australian Politics have many issues that when dealt with, result in the death of the party and most likely the minister’s reputation. A prime example is the energy policy otherwise known as the third rail. Infamous energy policies like the National Energy Guarantee have been debated by both members of parliament and the public, resulting in unstable and erratic energy prices. However, energy crises are not limited to the domestic political climate. On an international level, countries such as Canada and America have also struggled to uphold previous agreements and targets that kept them in public favour. Similarly, in Australia, disagreements regarding energy policy often stem from the so-called ‘donations’ made by the oil and coal industries to the federal government. This then dictates the development of sustainable green energy, the funding of